Non-Newtonian Mill Discharge Slurry (Metric Units)

Non-Newtonian Mill Discharge Slurry (English Units)

Summary

This example demonstrates how one can take small-scale raw rheological data for a mill slurry at a minerals plant and use it on a full-scale pipe calculation.

Topics Covered

  • Reviewing and entering rheological data

  • Using homogeneous scale-up features

  • Obtaining and using Power Law and Bingham Plastic constants

Required Knowledge

This example assumes the user has already worked through the Beginner - Three Reservoir example, or has a level of knowledge consistent with that topic. You can also watch the AFT Fathom Quick Start Video Tutorial Series on the AFT website, as it covers the majority of the topics discussed in the Three-Reservoir Problem example.

In addition the user should have worked through Non-Newtonian Phosphates Pumping example.

Model Files

This example uses the following files, which are installed in the Examples folder as part of the AFT Fathom installation:

Problem Statement

The piping for a non-settling slurry for a mill discharge at a minerals plant is being designed. The system will supply 200 m3/hr of slurry through a 12-inch (305 mm) horizontal pipe 100 meters long.

Rheological data using the actual fluid in a 1/4 inch (1 cm) pipe has been obtained. Perform non-settling slurry calculations to evaluate how well the Bingham Plastic and Power Law models follow the raw data. Then determine the pressure drop in the full-scale pipe using Bingham Plastic, Power Law and Homogeneous Scale-up models.

Step 1. Review Raw Data in Excel

The data taken for 1/4 inch STD schedule (0.9246 cm ID), 0.75 meter pipe is as follows:

Density = 1400 kg/m3

Table 1: Pressure drop data on mill slurry (1/4 inch pipe - 0.9246 cm ID, 0.75 meter long)

Run Q (m3/hr) dP (Pa)
1 0.003 25,000
2 0.015 36,000
3 0.025 44,000
4 0.050 53,000
5 0.100 60,000

The Bingham Plastic and Power Law models typically process data in terms of shear rate and shear stress. The above data needs to be changed into a form for input into AFT Fathom.

Open the provided Excel spreadsheet Non-Newtonian Mill Discharge Slurry Data.xlsx. Click the Excel tab for Metric units. Here one can see the raw data and calculated shear rate and shear stress. See Figure 1 for a view of the data. The shear rate and shear stress data is in the yellow columns.

Mill Slurry raw and calculated data in an Excel sheet.

Figure 1: Mill slurry raw and calculated data from Excel file

Step 2. Start AFT Fathom

From the Start Menu choose the AFT Fathom 13 folder and select AFT Fathom 13.

To ensure that your results are the same as those presented in this documentation, this example should be run using all default AFT Fathom settings, unless you are specifically instructed to do otherwise.

Step 3. Define the Fluid Properties Group

  1. Open Analysis Setup from the toolbar or from the Analysis menu.

  2. Open the Fluid panel:

    1. Fluid Library = User Specified Fluid

    2. Name = Mill Discharge Slurry

    3. Density = 1400 kg/m3

    4. Dynamic Viscosity = 1 Pa-sec (note that the viscosity entered here will not be used once the non-Newtonian parameters are entered)

  3. Open the Viscosity Model panel

    1. Viscosity Model = Bingham Plastic

    2. Select Calculate from Rheological Data

    3. Click Calculate Constants

    4. Raw Data Type = Tube Flow Rheometer Data (8V/D)

    5. Raw Data = (make sure to change the units for Shear Stress to Pascals)

Parameter Shear Rate Shear Stress
Units 1/seconds Pascals
1 10.7 77.0
2 53.7 110.9
3 89.5 135.6
4 179.0 163.3
5 358.0 184.9
    1. Curve Fit Order = 1

Data entered into the Calculate Bingham Plastic Constants window.

Figure 2: Bingham Plastic data entry

The graph for the Bingham Plastic curve fit.

Figure 3: Bingham Plastic curve fit and constants calculation

Step 4. Define the Pipes and Junctions Group

At this point, the first two groups are completed in Analysis Setup. The next undefined group is the Pipes and Junctions group. To define this group, the model needs to be assembled with all pipes and junctions fully defined. Click OK to save and exit Analysis Setup then assemble the model on the workspace as shown in the figure below.

The Workspace for the Mill Discharge Slurry example with a pipe connecting an assigned pressure junction to an assigned flow junction.

Figure 4: Layout of pipe system for Mill Discharge Slurry example

Pipe Properties

  1. Pipe Material = Steel - ANSI

  2. Pipe Geometry = Cylindrical Pipe

  3. Size = 1/4 inch

  4. Type = STD (schedule 40)

  5. Length = 0.75 meters

Junction Properties

  1. J1 Assigned Pressure

    1. Elevation = 0 meters

    2. Pressure = 10 bar (1000 kPa)

    3. Pressure Specification = Stagnation

  2. J2 Assigned Flow

    1. Elevation = 0 meters

    2. Type = Outflow

    3. Flow Specification = Volumetric Flow Rate

    4. Flow Rate = 0.003 m3/hr

ØTurn on Show Object Status from the View menu to verify if all data is entered. If so, the Pipes and Junctions group in Analysis Setup will have a check mark. If not, the uncompleted pipes or junctions will have their number shown in red. If this happens, go back to the uncompleted pipes or junctions and enter the missing data.

Step 5. Run the Model

Click Run Model on the toolbar or from the Analysis menu. This will open the Solution Progress window. This window allows you to watch as the AFT Fathom solver converges on the answer. Now view the results by clicking the Output button at the bottom of the Solution Progress window.

Step 6. Examine the Output

Figure 5 shows the Output window. It can be seen that the pressure drop is 0.3408 bar (34,082 Pascals) for 0.003 m3/hr, compared to the raw data value of 0.2500 bar (25,000 Pascals).

The Output window for the model.

Figure 5: The Output window with default output data

Step 7. Create Scenarios

From the Base Scenario, make a child scenario named Bingham Plastic.

Step 8. Run Other Bingham Plastic Scenarios

Load the Bingham Plastic scenario and use the Duplicate Special feature to create five identical runs. Enter flow rates of 0.015, 0.025, 0.050 and 0.100 m3/hr at the Assigned Flow junctions. Run the model and note the pressure drop for each pipe.

Step 9. Create and Run Power Law Scenarios

In the Scenario Manager, right click the Bingham Plastic scenario and select Clone Without Children. Name this scenario Power Law.

  1. Load the Power Law Scenario

  2. Open Analysis Setup

  3. Open the Viscosity Model panel

    1. Viscosity Model = Power Law

    2. Select Calculate from Rheological Data

    3. Click Calculate Constants

    4. Raw Data Type = Tube Flow Rheometer Data (8V/D)

    5. Raw Data = should still be loaded from before

    6. Curve Fit Order = 1

    7. Click Generate Curve Fit Now

    8. Click OK

  4. Click OK

Run the model again.

Figure 7 shows the output for each of the ten cases. Figure 8 plots the test data against the results of Bingham Plastic and Power Law. From Figure 8 it is clear the Power Law model fits the mill discharge slurry data better than Bingham Plastic.

The Power Law Curve fit shown on a graph.

Figure 6: Power Law curve fit from Viscosity Model panel

A summary of the AFT Fathom output and test data on an Excel sheet.

Figure 7: Summary of AFT Fathom output and test data

A graph comparing output for differnt viscosity models.

Figure 8: Graph comparing AFT Fathom output and test data

Step 10. Evaluate Full Scale Data

  1. Make another child scenario called Full Scale - 12 inch

  2. Change pipe P1 to 100 meters length and 12 inch diameter

  3. Change junction J2 to a flow rate of 200 m3/hr

  4. Make three child scenarios below Full Scale - 12 inch: one for each, Bingham Plastic, Power Law, and Homogeneous Scale-up

  5. Load the Bingham Plastic scenario, open Analysis Setup, and perform a curve fit for Bingham Plastic

  6. Run the Bingham Plastic scenario and note the pressure drop

  7. Repeat the above for the Power Law scenario

  8. For the Homogeneous Scale-up scenario, use the test data from the Excel spreadsheet. Make sure to enter the data as Volumetric in m3/hr and Jm in m/m. All 5 data points are laminar flow, as shown in Figure 9.

Full scale pressure drop comparison of Bingham Plastic, Power Law and Homogenous Scale-up models in the Output window.

Figure 9: Homogeneous Scale-up window with test data input

Figure 10 shows a comparison of pressure drop results using multi-scenario output for the three children. It can be seen that there is closer agreement between Power Law and Homogeneous Scale-up. The Bingham Plastic results are not as close which was true earlier in this example comparing to actual test data (Figure 8). Therefore the Bingham Plastic pressure drop should be excluded and the design pressure drop should be based on Power Law and Homogeneous Scale-up.

Full scale pressure drop comparison of Bingham Plastic, Power Law and Homogenous Scale-up models in the Output window.

Figure 10: Full scale pressure drop comparison of Bingham Plastic, Power Law, and Homogeneous Scale-up

Analysis Summary

A non-settling mill discharge slurry for a minerals plant was modeled using non-settling slurry calculations in AFT Fathom. Runs for small scale and full-scale calculation were made and pressure drop was determined for these cases.